Digital Variation of Machine Learning Through Basic Diagnostic Test Application Approach: an Integrative Literature Review

https://doi.org/10.33860/jik.v17i3.3355

Authors

  • Sanatang Sanatang Faculty of Informatics Engineering, State University of Makassar, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Aqmal Ismail Faculty of Informatics Engineering, State University of Makassar, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Keywords:

Machine Learning, Diagnosis, Electronic Medical Records

Abstract

Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) are digital applications of machine learning models that function to receive and store clinical data related to medical information for the purposes of basic clinical diagnostic tests. The integrative review aims to provide a synthesis of new findings from several articles on EMRs for the early detection of basic clinical diagnoses with a variety of existing populations. Using four databases, we reviewed 11 articles. All authors involved review abstracts and full text according to predetermined criteria. The selected articles are then integrated into the publication quality assessment matrix, further included in machine learning algorithms for diagnostic determination of the disease. Reviewed articles are excluded in the form of artificial intelligence. The PRISMA flowchart identified 1962 articles and the final selection found 11 articles. Circulating system networks dominate machine learning models (66.6%). The study netted an average population of 490.5 and the artificial intelligence system managed to detect 9 body systems from different body systems.  A total of 11 articles were selected, more than half of which were  Caucasian (80.90%) and white (72.95%), but only 1 article was represented by Caucasian ethnicity, while white race was almost in every article. African-American and Black racial groups were in the middle position at 29.95% and 17.50%. The racial representation with the least percentage below  10% was  Hispanic and Asian (6.10% and 2.17%). This machine learning has proven to be very accurate for detecting disease diagnoses in  hospital, other health clinics. Therefore, the further development of this application for the purpose of establishing clinical diagnosis precisely and accurately.

References

Spano IL, Sulis S, Serpi A, Marongiu I, Gatto G. EMC Characterization of Implantable Cardiac Medical Devices in an anechoic chamber. In: 2014 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. IEEE; 2014. p. 872–7.

Parasrampuria S, Henry J. Hospitals’ use of electronic health records data, 2015–2017. ONC Data Br. 2019;46:1–13.

Murdoch TB, Detsky AS. The inevitable application of big data to health care. Jama. 2013;309(13):1351–2.

Kononenko I. Machine learning for medical diagnosis: history, state of the art and perspective. Artif Intell Med. 2001;23(1):89–109.

Maity NG, Das S. Machine learning for improved diagnosis and prognosis in healthcare. In: 2017 IEEE aerospace conference. IEEE; 2017. p. 1–9.

Shah M, Shu D, Prasath VBS, Ni Y, Schapiro AH, Dufendach KR. Machine learning for detection of correct peripherally inserted central catheter tip position from radiology reports in infants. Appl Clin Inform. 2021;12(04):856–63.

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009 Jul;339:b2700.

Scopus. Scopus [Internet]. Scopus preview. 2023 [cited 2023 Sep 10]. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/home.uri

NCBI. Pubmed [Internet]. MeSH - NCBI. 2023 [cited 2023 Sep 10]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/

Compass. Compass Digital Library [Internet]. University Libraries. 2023 [cited 2023 Oct 9]. Available from: https://du.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/search?vid=01UODE_INST:01UODE_MAIN&mode=advanced&tab=Everything&offset=0&sortby=rank&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&lang=en

ACM. ACM Digital Library [Internet]. Association for Computing Machinery. 2023 [cited 2023 Sep 10]. Available from: https://dl.acm.org/search/advanced

Schnatter AR, Rooseboom M, Kocabas NA, North CM, Dalzell A, Twisk J, et al. Derivation of an occupational exposure limit for benzene using epidemiological study quality assessment tools. Toxicol Lett. 2020;334:117–44.

National Heart, Lung and BI. Study quality assessment tool [Internet]. NIH. 2021 [cited 2023 Aug 31]. Available from: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools

Pestian JP, Sorter M, Connolly B, Bretonnel Cohen K, McCullumsmith C, Gee JT, et al. A Machine Learning Approach to Identifying the Thought Markers of Suicidal Subjects: A Prospective Multicenter Trial. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2017 Feb;47(1):112–21.

NHLBI. Study Quality Assessment Tools [Internet]. NIH. 2013 [cited 2023 Oct 9]. Available from: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools

Ginestra JC. Clinician Perception of a Machine Learning–Based Early Warning System Designed to Predict Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(11):1477–84.

Levy S, Duda M, Haber N, Wall DP. Sparsifying machine learning models identify stable subsets of predictive features for behavioral detection of autism. Mol Autism. 2017;8:65.

Baxt WG, Shofer FS, Sites FD, Hollander JE. A neural network aid for the early diagnosis of cardiac ischemia in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Dec;40(6):575–83.

Li X, Xu X, Xie F, Xu X, Sun Y, Liu X, et al. A Time-Phased Machine Learning Model for Real-Time Prediction of Sepsis in Critical Care. Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct;48(10):e884–8.

Jorge A, Castro VM, Barnado A, Gainer V, Hong C, Cai T, et al. Identifying lupus patients in electronic health records: Development and validation of machine learning algorithms and application of rule-based algorithms. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Aug;49(1):84–90.

Corey KM, Kashyap S, Lorenzi E, Lagoo-Deenadayalan SA, Heller K, Whalen K, et al. Development and validation of machine learning models to identify high-risk surgical patients using automatically curated electronic health record data (Pythia): A retrospective, single-site study. PLoS Med. 2018 Nov;15(11):e1002701.

Gicquel Q, Tvardik N, Bouvry C, Kergourlay I, Bittar A, Segond F, et al. Annotation methods to develop and evaluate an expert system based on natural language processing in electronic medical records. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:1067.

Danford CJ, Lee JY, Strohbehn IA, Corey KE, Lai M. Development of an Algorithm to Identify Cases of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Cirrhosis in the Electronic Health Record. Dig Dis Sci. 2021 May;66(5):1452–60.

Sahli CA, Bibi A, Ouali F, Fredj SH, Dakhlaoui B, Othmani R, et al. Red cell indices: differentiation between β-thalassemia trait and iron deficiency anemia and application to sickle-cell disease and sickle-cell thalassemia. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013 Nov;51(11):2115–24.

Antohi EL, Ambrosy AP, Collins SP, Ahmed A, Iliescu VA, Cotter G, et al. Therapeutic Advances in the Management of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure. Am J Ther. 2019;26(2):e222–33.

Natarajan A, Lam G, Liu J, Beam AL, Beam KS, Levin JC. Prediction of extubation failure among low birthweight neonates using machine learning. J Perinatol. 2023 Feb;43(2):209–14.

Elkin PL, Froehling DA, Wahner-Roedler DL, Brown SH, Bailey KR. Comparison of natural language processing biosurveillance methods for identifying influenza from encounter notes. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jan;156(1 Pt 1):11–8.

Parikh RB, Teeple S, Navathe AS. Addressing Bias in Artificial Intelligence in Health Care. JAMA. 2019 Dec;322(24):2377–8.

Gijsberts CM, Groenewegen KA, Hoefer IE, Eijkemans MJC, Asselbergs FW, Anderson TJ, et al. Race/Ethnic Differences in the Associations of the Framingham Risk Factors with Carotid IMT and Cardiovascular Events. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0132321.

Zemore SE, Gilbert PA, Pinedo M, Tsutsumi S, McGeough B, Dickerson DL. Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Mutual Help Group Participation for Substance Use Problems. Alcohol Res. 2021;41(1):3.

Gianfrancesco MA, Tamang S, Yazdany J, Schmajuk G. Potential Biases in Machine Learning Algorithms Using Electronic Health Record Data. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Nov;178(11):1544–7.

Vyas DA, Eisenstein LG, Jones DS. Hidden in Plain Sight - Reconsidering the Use of Race Correction in Clinical Algorithms. N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug;383(9):874–82.

Holzinger A, Langs G, Denk H, Zatloukal K, Müller H. Causability and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov. 2019;9(4):e1312.

Thomsen K, Iversen L, Titlestad TL, Winther O. Systematic review of machine learning for diagnosis and prognosis in dermatology. J Dermatolog Treat. 2020 Aug;31(5):496–510.

de Filippis R, Carbone EA, Gaetano R, Bruni A, Pugliese V, Segura-Garcia C, et al. Machine learning techniques in a structural and functional MRI diagnostic approach in schizophrenia: a systematic review. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019;15:1605–27.

Kassem MA, Hosny KM, Damaševičius R, Eltoukhy MM. Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for Skin Lesion Classification and Diagnosis: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 2021 Jul;11(8).

Published

2023-11-17

How to Cite

Sanatang, S., & Ismail, M. A. (2023). Digital Variation of Machine Learning Through Basic Diagnostic Test Application Approach: an Integrative Literature Review. Poltekita : Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan, 17(3), 694–706. https://doi.org/10.33860/jik.v17i3.3355

Issue

Section

Review Article

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.